Wednesday, September 21, 2011

STATEMENT OF SEN. EDGARDO J. ANGARA


When Palafox and Associates was awarded the design contract for the master plan of the Aurora ecozone after a public bidding in November of 2008, we welcomed what we thought then was a piece of good news.  From his many TV interviews, Felino Palafox Jr. came across as a conscientious architect imbued with a civic spirit.
How wrong we were.

For a fee of P32 million, Palafox and Associates came  out with a master plan that was declared useless by three government agencies : the Philippine Ports  Authority (PPA), the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) and the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel (OGCC).
It was a sloppy piece of design work that proposed a seaport very near an airport. That shabby piece of architecture would endanger the whole project, according to the agencies that evaluated the technical and environmental soundness of the Palafox master plan. 
Instead of correcting his design, the self-proclaimed “internationally-known architect” engaged in an accusing binge after the rejection of his master plan. He called the ecozone project—that was initiated to lift underdeveloped areas on the coastal areas of Central Luzon into the 21st century—a “scam”.
He accused us of benefitting from the project, which belongs to government and where our participation is a requisite of the law creating the ecozone, a project that has been considerably derailed by the faulty and shabby design work of Palafox.
If there was anybody that benefitted from the project it was Felino Palafox Jr.
For his useless design work with a billing of P32 million,  the administrators of the Aurora Pacific Economic Zone and  Freeport Authority have decided to take action against Palafox Jr. They have had enough of this phony. 

He was accused of violating the code of ethics of architects before the Professional Regulations Commission (PRC) and violating the code of ethics of environmental planners before the Environmental Planning Board under the commission.
The two charges seek to strip him of his license, which, hopefully, would strip of him of the moral perch he has been using as platform for his professional bankruptcy and phoniness. (30)

No comments:

Post a Comment